Antonis Georgiou successfully defended his client in a high-profile criminal case before the Assize Court, the highest first instance court for serious offenses in Cyprus. Through effective cross-examination, Antonis Georgiou dismantled the prosecution's case, ultimately leading the court to reject the credibility of the complainant's testimony. The court found that the prosecution's claims were entirely false, and based on the cross-examination, the judge deemed the evidence unworthy of consideration. The clients were acquitted of all charges, highlighting Antonis Georgiou's exceptional skill in challenging witness credibility and securing favorable outcomes in criminal defense.
DECISION ON CRIMINAL CASE – ACQUITTAL BASED ON CROSS-EXAMINATION OF PROSECUTION'S TESTIMONY
Latest Articles
SUMMARY JUDGMENT GRANTED IN COMMERCIAL PROPERTY DISPUTE
In a recent decision of the Larnaca District Court, the Court granted summary judgment in favour of a property owner in proceedings concerning the unlawful occupation of commercial premises following the termination of a lease due to non-payment of rent. The Court held that the respondents had no real prospect of successfully defending the claim, rejecting jurisdictional objections, assertions of lawful possession, and proposed counterclaims as lacking evidential or legal substance. It was further found that the continued occupation of the premises without payment constituted unlawful interference with the applicant’s property rights.
Pre-Action Disclosure of Documents under Part 31.7 of the New Civil Procedure Rules
The case was handled on behalf of the Respondent by Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC, and afforded the Court the opportunity to rule, at the level of principle, on the conditions, limits and exceptional nature of pre-action disclosure in a field where — as expressly acknowledged in the judgment itself — no binding Cypriot case law has existed to date. It is expected that the decision will serve as a point of reference for future Cypriot jurisprudence and will guide both judicial practice and procedural strategy under the New Civil Procedure Rules.
ΠΑΡΑΜΕΡΙΣΜΟΣ ΑΠΟΦΑΣΗΣ ΛΟΓΩ ΜΗ ΠΑΡΟΥΣΙΑΣ
Η αίτηση αφορούσε τον παραμερισμό απόφασης που εκδόθηκε σε βάρος του εναγομένου λόγω της μη παρουσίας του κατά τη συνέχιση της ακροαματικής διαδικασίας, παρότι αυτός εμφανίστηκε στο Δικαστήριο λίγα λεπτά μετά την έκδοση της απόφασης, εμφανιζόμενος αυτοπροσώπως.
Newsletter Registration .
