Antonis Georgiou successfully defended his client in a defamation case by effectively arguing the fair comment defense. The court ruled that the published statements were protected as expressions of opinion based on factual matters that were of public interest. Antonis Georgiou's legal strategy emphasized that the comments made were made in good faith, without malice, and were based on matters of public concern. This decision reinforced the importance of the fair comment defense in defamation cases, ensuring that his client’s reputation was protected from unwarranted claims.
Latest Articles
Publications
CONTEMPT OF COURT ORDERS: THE QUASI-CRIMINAL NATURE OF CIVIL ENFORCEMENT & DISTINCTION FROM THE CRIMINAL OFFENCE OF DISOBEDIENCE
Recognising this distinction is essential to ensuring that the appropriate legal remedy is pursued and that the principles of due process are respected. Importantly, both mechanisms may be invoked or triggered through the initiative of private individuals or parties, offering them powerful tools for enforcing their rights where those rights have been formalised and protected through judicial orders.
Aug. 1, 2025
News
75 YEARS OF PROFESSIONALISM AND LEGAL EXCELLENCE
Honoring the Past, Investing in the Future of Law. On the occasion of completing 75 years of continuous and meaningful presence in the legal world of Cyprus, the law firm Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC organized an anniversary event honoring its historic journey. Held in an atmosphere of honor and emotion, the event brought together distinguished personalities from the political and business sectors of the country, clients and associates of the firm, as well as representatives of the Cyprus Chamber of Commerce and Industry (CCCI), the House of Representatives, and the legal community.
Jul. 8, 2025
Publications
JUSTICE PREVAILS: A LANDMARK WIN BEFORE THE CYPRUS COURT OF APPEAL – GAGGING ORDERS vs. THE RIGHT TO A FAIR TRIAL
On 4 July 2025, the Cyprus Court of Appeal issued a unanimous and principled judgment that overturned an unjust ruling of the District Court. The case concerned the fundamental right of persons who are affected by court orders issued without notice (ex parte) to be heard in the proceedings, even if they are not joined as parties to the interim application. This judgment marks a landmark precedent in civil procedure, and a moment of professional pride for our firm, Phoebus, Christos Clerides & Associates LLC, which had the privilege to represent the affected individuals.
Jul. 7, 2025
Stay in touch!
Newsletter Registration .
Newsletter Registration .