Antonis Georgiou successfully represented the applicants in securing an interim order to freeze assets in a complex international fraud case, involving allegations of fraudulent transactions and connections to the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine. The case centered around the illegal movement and concealment of assets, and the applicants sought to prevent the defendant from transferring shares in certain companies, which could affect the eventual outcome of the claim. The court granted the interim freezing order, agreeing that the circumstances met the urgency and legal requirements under the Courts Law. This included the protection of shares in companies associated with the defendant, pending the full trial. The court also required the applicants to provide a €300,000 guarantee, underlining the gravity of the situation. This decision is crucial in safeguarding the applicants' interests in an international dispute with significant geopolitical implications.
DECISION ON INTERIM ORDER – SUCCESSFUL GRANTING OF TEMPORARY ASSET FREEZING ORDER IN COMPLEX INTERNATIONAL FRAUD CASE
Latest Articles
RECTIFICATION OF PROCEDURAL ERROR
In a groundbreaking case, Antonis Georgiou successfully argued for the rectification of a procedural error regarding an affidavit mistakenly submitted in Greek instead of English. This matter had never been decided before in Cyprus, making it a one-of-a-kind legal challenge. The court, acknowledging his legal reasoning based on the New Civil Procedure Rules and relevant case law, ruled in favor of his client, setting a precedent for procedural flexibility and fairness in affidavit submissions.
WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW BEFORE SIGNING CONTRACTS: A COMPREHENSIVE GUIDE
Signing a contract is often a critical step in both personal and professional dealings. Whether you’re entering into a business agreement, leasing a property, or finalizing a service contract, understanding every aspect of the document is essential to protect your interests. Below are key points to consider before putting pen to paper.
WHEN CAN LOST PROFITS IN PUBLIC TENDERS BE COMPENSATED? CYPRUS APPEAL COURT'S DECISION
This ruling sets an important precedent for cases involving public tenders and administrative annulments. It strengthens the legal stance that the administration is not obliged to award a contract or provide compensation unless direct financial harm is proven. Furthermore, it clarifies that lost profit is not a compensable claim unless there is clear and substantiated financial loss directly resulting from the annulled administrative decision.
Newsletter Registration .